Harmonizing Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Enhancing Efficiency and Synergy between WTO and ISDS System

This research article explores aligning and optimizing dispute resolution mechanisms in international law, particularly within the World Trade Organization (WTO) Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) contexts. Addressing challenges arising from "spaghetti bowl effect" of multiple treaty regimes, it examines interplay between WTO ISDS systems, aiming for harmonization reduced jurisdictional inconsistencies. Traditional coordination methods are evaluated, revealing limitations adapting to this evolving paradigm. Instead, an "articulation clause" "principle comity" proposed as innovative approaches rationalizing resolution. These strategies aim transcend rivalry mechanisms, expediting impasse Appellate Body. The study promotes a strategic shift, encouraging stakeholders view dual mutually advantageous. pragmatic outlook empowers informed decision-making, enhancing global rule law's predictability, efficiency, integrity. ultimate goal is strengthening WTO's framework mechanism, contributing more streamlined cohesive landscape. qualitative methodology has been applied following article.